Talk:Keys
From PGFSOA Wiki
[edit] Federated Governance
Section 4.1.7 - I think this section has been overtaken by events - the work in the next generation segment architecture practice guidance team outlines some pretty good thinking on how to do federated governance. This newer treatment is more concrete and practical and should be reflected here in my opinion.
The main idea is that we absolutely cannot layer any more governance on folks and expect them to accept it. Rather, we need to first identify governance requirements via the EA framework and then map to existing bodies. Over time these existing bodies will strenghten and potentially normalize based on requirements to do so and seeing the big picture. But that has to be emergent. I think we can shorten this section and reference the next generation practice guidance.
Perhaps the next generation practice guidance team can update and streamline this section?
--Kshemendra Paul 17:21, 9 March 2008 (EDT)
"An emerging development in the second approach is the use of semantic technologies and ontologies to establish precise relationships among data that can be used with inference engines to uncover additional relationships and enable interoperability across domains. While these technologies are at an early stage, they appear to hold significant promise for the future. The increasing “openness”, granularity, and modularity in the service implementation infrastructure (e.g., Java Business Integration (JBI), or Service Component Architecture (SCA)) allows considerable cross enterprise interoperability at reasonable cost and time scales. "
Reference the last para. in the Interoperability Subsection.
Seems this is an opinion and is very "fluffy". To "fluffy" to conclude that the technology "allows considerable cross enterprise interoperability at reasonable cost and time scales." If this isa a fact the language needs to be strenghtened to read as one.
Mabry, April 1, 2008
[edit] Keys to Federal SOA Implementation
This section seems to be expanding and the organizaing principle for the other sections although we say SOE, SOA and SOI, is the organizing concept it seems to get lost in the level of writing. Are we forgetting our audiance? Seems we would be better off digesting this section and making sure it correlates with the next section "Roadmap for SOA Adoption. The way this sections seems to be evolving is we are running the risk of loosing our audiance. We want the keys to be retainable and actionable and then measurable in the Roadmap. Seems like this idea might have been lost in this section.
Mabry April 1, 2008
